Blogger Template by Blogcrowds.

An Open Letter to my Earlier Self about #Book #Reviews and #Reviewers

This is Letter Two of Four of my "open letter to my earlier self" series that first appeared on The Book Cove, http://www.thebookcover.com, late November - December, 2014.
Letter One appeared on my site, http://www.sallyember.com/blog , on 3/26/15.
Letters Three and Four post on April 11 and 18, 2015.

I published my first ebook in December, 2013, and my second in June, 2014. My third just published last month, March, 2015. What I wish I had known before my first ebook went into pre-sales in November, 2013, about book reviews and reviewers could probably fill a book all by itself. I will try to make my life lessons more pithy, here.


------------------------------------------------------

Dear Sally,

You undoubtedly feel all excited about your first science-fiction/romance ebook's publication, as you should. You are eager to read the first reviews, wondering how readers will respond, right?

Part of your preparation has been to read reviews and write reviews yourself on Goodreads. You have mostly been reading books you get from the library from rather well-known authors and writing reviews of those.




Alternatively, you have been reading a few works-in-progress by new and indie authors on http://www.Authonomy.com and http://www.Wattpad.com and leaving comments. Some authors have been commenting on your excerpts, also.

Several authors and bloggers are volunteering to review your first ebook and you are searching sites for other possible reviewers. You have been lucky: several have agreed, so you are able to put some of their choice reviewers' comments into the final epub version's front matter of your first Volume of The Spanners Series, This Changes Everything, prior to its actual release!


You are feeling great!  Many of the reviewers are quite positive, giving the book 5 and 4 stars. Even the 3-star reviews have positive comments amidst the critiques and offer valuable points of view. You are psyched!

Then, the DNF (Did Not Finish) "reviews" start to appear, with 1- or 2-star ratings even though they didn't read even half (and in some cases, even one-quarter) of your 323-pg book. Now come the lessons.







  • Reviews and Reviewers Lesson No. 1: Do not expect all reviewers actually to read your book or to behave like professional reviewers.

  • DNF quote
    image from http://authorceo.com
    What? How do non-readers get to call themselves "reviewers"?

    People who only watch a few minutes of a movie or TV show or walk out at intermission for a live performance aren't entitled to submit a full review much less a rating. Why are these readers doing this? What gives them any right to even comment, much less evaluate your book with so little experience of it? Reviewers are supposed to READ the book, first, aren't they?

    HA HA HA HA HA! You wish!



    NO DNF logo
    image from http://frodosco.com
    It's all right. Calm down. Blog about DNFs and move on. Enjoy their snarky comments(some of the are quite witty and even funny), post them right along with the other reviewers' insightful remarks. What do you care? It's not as if their DNF opinions matter: they did not read your book!  Ignore.











  • Reviews and Reviewers Lesson No. 2: Not all readers will comment; not all downloads lead to readers.

  • Do not expect all readers to leave comments or reviews.






  • Reviews and Reviewers Lesson No. 3: Reviewers are all volunteers (or mostly) and often do not have the ability to meet stated deadlines.

  • Waiting for Godot
    image from http://blogs.mprnews.org
    Do not expect all reviewers who say they will review your book to do it in a timely fashion or at all. Waiting for reviews? May as well be waiting for Godot. "There is nothing to be done."












  • Reviews and Reviewers Lesson No. 4: Reviewers will not always respond to requests.

  • Do not be surprised when requests for reviews are ignored even when you follow all the reviewers' guidelines and fill out their forms, even when your book falls within their genre specifications and meets their criteria perfectly, not even when they claim they will respond to all requests.






  • Reviews and Reviewers Lesson No. 5: Be open to a "swap" or don't join the clubs.

  • When you say that you are not a "review swap" kind of author, explaining that, on the rare occasion you do accept another author's book to read and review (because you're very busy writing), that:
    a) you cannot promise to provide their book with a 4- or 5-Star ranking,
    b) you do not know what you will think of their book prior to reading it, and
    c) you can't promise a "positive" review,
    do not be surprised when some reviewers/authors refuse to review your book at all (and some are quite snarky about it).
    ALLiEthicalAuthor_Final-Outlines-300x173
    The Alliance of Independent Authors (ALLi) developed a Code of Ethics (#ethicalauthor) http://www.selfpublishingadvice.org/ethical-author-campaign/ in November, 2014, that included these statements in the Reviewing and Rating books section, which I like (except for the missing apostrophe on the final use of reader):
    "I do not review or rate my own or another author’s books in any way that misleads or deceives the reader. I am transparent about my relationships with other authors when reviewing their books.

    "I am transparent about any reciprocal reviewing arrangements, and avoid any practices that result in the reader being deceived."

    Then, they also included this part in Reacting to reviews, which I thoroughly agree with:

    "I do not react to any book review by harassing the reviewer, getting a third party to harass the reviewer, or making any form of intrusive contact with the reviewer. If I’ve been the subject of a personal attack in a review, I respond in a way that is consistent with professional behaviour."

    Read the entire Ethical Author Code and decide if you, as an author, want to adhere to it, or you as a reader want authors to adhere to it. If you do, download the badge, below, and spread the word! http://www.selfpublishingadvice.org/alli-campaigns/ethical-author/






  • Reviews and Reviewers Lesson No. 6: Most reviews and authors' groups do not accept "negative" reviews.

  • Some even have agreements up front that they will not post or give any books lower than a 3-Stars ranking. They consider a 3 (out of 5) to be a "terrible" rating.

    When you are involved with some authors' groups which require "review swaps" as part of "belonging" to their "club" (which I heartily recommend AGAINST joining for precisely that reason and more besides) and you read the book you have chosen or been assigned and discover that it is a book you have to give a 2-star rating to (and that is being generous, in your opinion), do not be surprised when the club leaders seem supportive but it turns out that they are not.

    Be prepared for the author to tell you that s/he is "too thin-skinned" to talk to you about your responses prior to your posting the review. You do wonder, however, how anyone can publish books, put their writing out in public, expect all their readers to react positively every time and make no emotional preparations for the eventuality of rejection or negative feedback from readers.

    Take it in stride when the leaders refuse to post your review even though it meets all their stated criteria, you warned them in advance that it was not "positive," and they emailed you that "an honest opinion was all they wanted or expected from their members." Do not take their lack of integrity personally, even when they cast aspersions on your character and hint that you are "being unfair" and "unkind." Do not take the bait, even when they keep asking you questions that imply how heartless you are to rate that book so low, such as, "Don't you know how hard this author worked on that book?"

    We wish everyone realized that rational, negative reviews can be helpful, as blogger Jody Hedlund points out in this great meme:

    Negative reviews can be helpful
    image from http://jodyhedlund.blogspot.com






  • Reviews and Reviewers Lesson No. 7: Even the readers who chose to review your book may not like your genre or understand your book, yet will blame you for their lack of enjoyment and comprehension.

  • Why, you wonder, would a reader who already knows she doesn't like science-fiction choose to read, much less claim to want to review, a science-fiction book? There are ALIENS on the cover. There is no mistaking the genre of this book! What is the deal?

    The components of Buddhism and Judaism figure prominently in your books and you make that clear in blurbs and your bio. So, why would a born-again Christian, a devout Muslim or Catholic or any other religious-leaning person who has problems accepting Buddhism or Judaism in fictional characters and plots (or in real life, actually) choose YOUR books to review? What were they imagining would happen?

    You put information right in the first chapters of your books regarding its format (all in the present tense on purpose, for example, and presentations of multiple timelines), yet some reviewers will criticize your writing for these exact components, commenting that you "needed a better editor" since you "obviously don't know how to use verb tenses," or complain that "there were too many versions of the same story."


    Support indie authors 2
    image from http://alifeboundbybooks.blogspot.com
    We authors can't please everyone, nor should we even try. Write your best book, Sally. Appreciate ALL reviews, even the DNFs. Keep going. By the time you get to Volume III or IV, this "newbie indie author" phase will seem as if it happened in another lifetime.

    Meanwhile, support other indie authors. Write and leave reviews, rankings, comments and LIKES.





    --------------------------------------------


    Sally is the author of The Spanners Series. The Spanners Series is for adults/new adults and young adults. Sci-fi/ romance/ paranormal/ multiverse/ utopian/speculative fiction stories for this series come to author, Sally Ember, from dreams, meditation, visions and scientific research. www.sallyember.com/



    6 Comments:

    1. L. A. Kelley said...
      I hear you. My book,One Enchanted Evening (an updated version of Little Red Riding Hood), got dinged half a star from a reviewer because they didn't understand why I related my villain to a wolf...Oy.
      sallyember.com said...
      That is hilarious, L.A. Kelley! I have also heard of "reviewers" who slam a book because they didn't want to read anything with ...............(fill in the blank), but ............ was IN THE TITLE. Seriously demented people "out there." Button up your overcoat!

      Best to you,

      Sally
      Quanie Miller said...
      I never understood how people could "review" a book they haven't even read. Makes no sense to me. I guess we just have to continue to write and reach our target audience in hopes that our books move people enough to make them feel something, whether good or bad (and hopefully, those people will leave reviews!). Great post. Thanks for sharing.
      sallyember.com said...
      I know, Quanie Miller. Those pesky DNF or did-not-read comments shouldn't be allowed in the same category as actual reviews, right?

      You're very welcome. Thanks for reading and commenting.

      Best to you,

      Sally
      Jennifer Jackson said...
      I do not think that public ratings should be given to DNFs like on Amazon, Goodreads, and other book review sites. That falsely drives down a rating in my opinion. And I think many DNFs are simply because the reader didn't understand the topic. But I do think that writing a review is okay as long as it says why they didn't finish. That could be very important. Was it too convoluted, poor writing, not an accurate representation of a topic?
      sallyember.com said...
      HI, again, Jennifer,

      So glad to have your opinions and comments on this series. You bring up some excellent points. I would offer that people who DNF a book are not reviewing it. They are commenting on WHY they didn't finish or didn't want to continue reading. I still maintain that someone who doesn't finish a piece of writing, theatre, film or other art should not label their comments a "review,' but, rather, an opinion.

      There should be somewhere for those, but not in "reviews," which, by definition, are supposed to be a "look back" upon something whole, not partial.

      However, since there is NOT a separate place for comments or opinions for DNFs, the DNF nature of that person's comments should be in the TITLE and right up front, yes? I would also add that that person should offer a percentage of how much of that writing s/he actually read.

      Best to you,

      Sally

    Post a Comment



    Newer Post Older Post Home

    © The Book Cove, 2013. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to The Book Cove with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

    The Book Cove is a private entity independent of the promotions, events, features, authors, programs and so forth that are featured on The Book Cove website or in newsletters. The Book Cove does not guarantee quality or content of those works and events featured. The Book Cove does not assure legality of the works and events featured.

    Creative Commons License
    Book Cove Reviews by http://www.thebookcove.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.